AI Models
Compare 20 model versions — Claude Opus, Sonnet and Fable, Grok, DeepSeek and Cursor Composer, with GPT and Gemini for reference — on API price, what Cursor charges, benchmarks from the makers and from independent leaderboards, and articles that put them head to head.
Side by side
Pick a quick compare above, or tick models in the list below.
Articles and comparisons
42 reviews, head-to-heads and benchmark write-ups, newest first.
- BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Artificial Analysis · 2026-09-22 · Opus 5.5 vs Sonnet 5
Intelligence Index 58 against 38.
- Digital Applied · 2026-09-22 · Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
Opus 5.5 lists at 40% of Astra's price and leads terminal coding; Astra leads science.
- Kingy AI · 2026-09-22 · Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra, Fable 5.1, Grok 4.7, DeepSeek
Near-Fable results for less money.
- OfficeChai · 2026-09-22 · Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, Fable 5.1, Opus 5
58 against 53 for GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1.
- EvoLink · 2026-09-22 · Grok 4.7 vs Opus 5
Opus 5 leads 51 to 46 on the AA index; Grok costs about a third less per suite despite 70% more output tokens.
- alexusadays (YouTube) · 2026-09-22 · Opus 5.5, GPT-6, Grok 4.7
- BenchmarkBenchmarking Grok 4.7Artificial Analysis · 2026-09-21 · Grok 4.7 vs Opus 5, Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-5.6 Sol
- MarkTechPost · 2026-09-21 · Grok 4.7, Grok 4.6, GPT-5.6 Sol, Fable 5.1
- DataCamp · 2026-09-17 · V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Tech Insider · 2026-09-16 · GPT-6 Astra, Fable 5.1, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- OrcaRouter · 2026-09-14 · DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.6
DeepSeek is 3–9× cheaper, with open weights.
- MindStudio · 2026-09-12 · V4.1 Flash vs Opus 5, GPT-5.6, GPT-6 Astra, Gemini 3.8 Flash
- VentureBeat · 2026-09-10 · V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-6 Astra, Opus 5, Fable 5, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Grok
- Tech Insider · 2026-09-08 · GPT-6 Astra, Opus 5, Fable 5.1, Gemini 3.8 Flash / 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.6 Sol, DeepSeek V4, Grok
- Lex Clips (YouTube) · 2026-09-06 · Fable, Opus 5, GPT Sol, Grok, DeepSeek
- DataCamp · 2026-08-30 · Grok 4.6 vs Opus 5
Opus leads on real-work Elo (1861 vs 1753); Grok is about 75% cheaper.
- DataCamp · 2026-08-21 · Grok 4.6 vs GPT-5.6 Sol, Sonnet 5, Opus 5, Fable 5, Gemini 3.7 Flash
- Speedway Media · 2026-08-17 · Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Quotes an older AA index scale (60.9 vs 53.0); today it is 44 vs 36.
- OrcaRouter · 2026-08-14 · Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Opus 5
- MindStudio · 2026-08-13 · V4 Pro 0813 vs Claude Opus, Fable 5, GPT, Gemini
- Julian Goldie SEO (YouTube) · 2026-08-13 · DeepSeek V4 Pro, Fable 5, Grok 4.6
- DataCamp · 2026-08-03 · Opus 5 vs Sonnet 5
Sonnet 5 costs 40–60% of Opus and performs close to Opus 4.8.
- Thomas Wiegold · 2026-07-28 · Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.5
- Apidog · 2026-06-17 · Composer 2.5, Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5
SWE-bench Multilingual 79.8% vs 80.5% for Opus 4.7, at about a tenth of the cost.
- Luke Byrne (YouTube) · 2026-06-16 · DeepSeek V4 vs Opus 4.8
- DeepLearning.AI — The Batch · 2026-06-12 · Composer 2.5, Opus 4.7 / 4.8, GPT-5.5 (Codex), DeepSeek V4 Pro
Third on independent coding boards, at $0.44 a task against $4.14 for Opus 4.7.
- Agents' Last Exam · 2026-06-09 · GPT-5.5 Codex, Claude Fable 5, Composer 2.5
Fable 5's scores were inflated by a silent fallback to Opus 4.8 on 35% of tasks.
- CodingFleet · 2026-06-06 · Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek is 28.7× cheaper and wins the algorithmic tests.
- DevOps.com · 2026-06-01 · Grok Build vs Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor
- DataCamp · 2026-05-22 · Composer 2.5, Composer 2, Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5
- Tech Times · 2026-05-20 · Composer 2.5, Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5
- Artificial Analysis · 2026-05-20 · Composer 2.5, Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5
Scored 62, third behind Opus 4.7 (66) and GPT-5.5 (65), at $0.07 a task.
- Lushbinary · 2026-05-19 · Composer 2.5, Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5
- Digital Applied · 2026-05-18 · Composer 2.5 vs Claude Code on Opus 4.7 / Sonnet 4.6
Close on benchmarks at $0.50 / $2.50 against $5 / $25, but only inside Cursor.
- Codersera · 2026-05-08 · Composer 2 vs Sonnet 4.6
- DataCamp · 2026-04-30 · Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro / Flash
SWE-bench Pro 64.3 vs 55.4; DeepSeek is over 7× cheaper per output token.
- Fortune · 2026-04-24 · DeepSeek V4 vs Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro
- The Register · 2026-04-24 · DeepSeek V4 vs GPT-5.5, DeepSeek V3 / R1
- VentureBeat · 2026-03-19 · Composer 2, Composer 1.5, Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4
- Introl · 2025-12-10 · V3.2 vs GPT-5, Gemini 3 Pro, Opus 4.5
- Composio · 2025-11-11 · Composer 1 vs Sonnet 4.5
- CometAPI · 2025-11-03 · Composer 1 vs GPT-5-Codex
All models
12 of 20 versions. Tick up to 8 to compare.
| Model | Released | API in / out | Cursor in / out | Context | AA Index | Arena Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | $2 / $10 | — | 1.05M | 48 | — | |
| 2026-09-21 | $2 / $6 | $2 / $6 | 500K | 46 | — | |
| 2026-09-10 | $0.30 / $1.20 | — | 1M | 39 | — | |
| 2026-09-04 | $10 / $50 | — | 1.05M | 53 | 1480 | |
| 2026-09-02 | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.75 / $3.50 | 1.05M | 41 | 1493 | |
| 2026-08-13 | $1.32 / $3.96 | — | 1M | 36 | 1463 | |
| 2026-08-13 | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.75 / $3.50 | 1.05M | — | 1490 | |
| 2026-08-12 | $2 / $6 | $2 / $6 | 500K | 44 | 1456 | |
| 2026-07-09 | $4 / $20 | $4 / $20 | 1.05M | — | 1483 | |
| 2026-05-29 | $1 / $2 | — | 256K | — | — | |
| 2026-05-18 | Cursor only | $0.50 / $2.50 | 200K | — | — | |
| 2026-02-19 | $2 / $12 | $2 / $12 | 1.05M | 30 | 1487 |
Reading the numbers
Checked September 2026. Prices are official US list prices per million tokens; a reported tag means the maker no longer lists it (retired versions) and it comes from trackers. OpenRouter now is fetched live and can be lower than list price when a cheaper host serves the model.
In Cursor is what Cursor bills against your plan. Composer and Grok sit in Cursor's own pool, which every plan includes much more of; everything else is charged at the API price. OpenAI is cutting Cursor off from its models on 12 November 2026.
Benchmarks marked vendor were run by the model's maker, on its own harness and effort setting; independent runs (Artificial Analysis, Vals, arena.ai, ARC Prize, tbench.ai) often land lower. Each number links its source. Versions are separate rows — Terminal-Bench 2.0, 2.1 and 4.0 are different task sets and can't be compared. Most labs stopped publishing SWE-bench Verified, GPQA and AIME in 2026 because they are saturated, so newer models have gaps there rather than low scores.
Instructions
Compare AI models version by version — Claude Opus and Sonnet, Grok, DeepSeek and Cursor Composer, plus GPT and Gemini — on price, benchmarks and what reviewers wrote.
- Click a Quick compare such as Composer 2.5 vs Opus 5, or tick models in All models.
- Read Side by side: API price, the price inside Cursor, a live OpenRouter price, then benchmarks grouped into overall, coding and reasoning. The best value in each row is green.
- Articles about these models lists head-to-head reviews first, then ones comparing the same families at other versions.
- Narrow the list with the Families chips or the search box, and tick Include legacy and retired versions to see older releases.
Tips
- Blended (3:1) weights input three times output, a rough stand-in for a coding session. Composer has no public API, so its blend uses Cursor's price.
- Hover a benchmark score to see who measured it and at what effort; the row name links the leaderboard.
- Your picks and filters are kept in local storage on this device only. The live price comes from OpenRouter via this site.
- Hit Example and click the highlighted Composer 2.5 vs Opus 5 quick compare to see a full comparison with its articles.